The daily-death data for Chicago residents show that the autumn 2020 increase peaked before deployment of the COVID shot.
Five healthcare workers at a hospital on the city’s west side were the first to receive the shot on 16 December 2020. A shipment of 43,000 doses of the Pfizer version had arrived at Illinois’ National Strategic Reserve that week. One month earlier, Governor J.B. Pritzker and then-Mayor of Chicago Lori Lightfoot initiated a second round of closure orders.
The timing is interesting in retrospect and, possibly, strategic. COVID “cases” (testing efforts) were increasing during the fall, officials then “did something,” and all-cause deaths peaked and began to decline before the shot arrived. After the shot, deaths did not drop sharply, but neither did they rise. That pattern appears somewhat at odds with reports from researchers and citizen analysts describing increases in deaths in various cities and countries after COVID injection was rolled out.
In late 2021 and early 2022, the city health department used sketchy definitions and disappeared data in reporting COVID-blamed deaths among unvaccinated and vaccinated residents.
COVID deaths virtually vanished in the city and county in spring 2022 when the medical examiner’s temporary jurisdiction over all hospital, nursing home, and hospice facility COVID deaths ended.
Chicago was home to the second “coronavirus” case in the United States: a nurse returning to the city from visiting family in Wuhan, China. When her husband subsequently tested asymptomatic positive — and was hospitalized without being sick, per his testimony — the couple was documented in The Lancet as the first person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the United States. Evidence from a separate study strongly suggests transmission between the couple did not occur. Emails sent to researchers and journal editors were never acknowledged.1
Despite the early case, like everywhere in the world, deaths in Chicago did not begin to rise until after an emergency was declared and actions taken in response to an unseen, unproven viral threat.
New York City announced a case six weeks after Chicago did; neither city was experiencing anything unusual death-wise in January or February. New York’s massive 740%+ rise (base to peak) began around March 18th and Chicago’s smaller 115% increase roughly ten days later.
The differences in timing, magnitude, and duration are not explainable by a virus “hitting” the two cities differentially — an absurd proposition discussed in this comparison of Chicago, New York, and Bergamo:
I’ve asserted New York’s and Bergamo’s all-cause curves are fraudulent and only partly explainable by iatrogenic measures but have not made a similar assertion about Chicago’s data and currently consider Chicago’s spring 2020 event entirely iatrogenic.
Footnote
- The Lancet study should be retracted because the core claim about person-to-person transmission is contradicted by the couple’s respective sequences and the placement thereof in the phylogenetic tree, per the Nature study featuring the couple ↩︎
Leave a Reply