A comment I posted this morning on a Wall Street Journal article about proposed solutions to the alleged hantavirus problem has been rejected for violating community rules. I’m posting it here as a record of what I said.
I submitted the following comment on “The Next Frontier for Hantavirus: Finding Vaccines and Treatments” at 8:09 am US Central:
There was no outbreak. These events are staged.
This is about creating problems for which “vaccine” solutions await and engaging public health agencies and military forces in practice exercises.
Americans and citizens of other countries should regard performances like these as acts that serve to feign substantiation of decades of lies about viral transmission.
The comment received one “like” before I received an email at 9:02 a.m. saying it had been rejected.
No specific violation was given. Reviewing the rules, my guess is that a moderator determined the comment was deliberately false, misleading or appears to be part of an organized campaign.
This is the first time I can recall the Journal rejecting one of my comments.
In July 2022, my Twitter account was “permanently suspended” over a tweet that directly quoted WSJ reporter Allysia Finley’s article on the COVID-19 vaccine for toddlers.
The Wood House 76 article on the incident, “Here We Go Again”, was later cited in an amicus brief submitted in Murthy v Missouri.
I support news organizations and independent writers having and applying comment policies, and I do not consider the removal of my comment today a free speech or free press issue. The comment was censored; there was no abrogation of Constitutional rights.
However, I do wonder who and what is being protected with the removal of what I said.
I’ve elevated the Wall Street Journal‘s hantavirus coverage in two recent articles (“Hantavirus: Here we go again?” and “Hantavirus as ‘ sentinel event’”) and have written about a 8 January 2020 WSJ piece as the earliest example of the lab leak end of the lab leak versus wet market false binary.
Whether Americans believe the latest “outbreak” event is staged, constructed, leveraged, hyped, or genuine, most can hopefully acknowledge this much: profit seeks opportunity, and has little tolerance for critics who stand in the way.
12 May 2026: My second attempt at 9:20 pm US Central was also rejected.
22 May 2026
28 May 2026
WSJ editorial board praising RFK’s “targeted PREP Act” decision (27 May 2026):
Comment posted and approved ~1:19 PM US Central:
Received notice of Comment Rejection on 29 May 2026, 11:29 am US Central
###
