Documenting my recent public statements on the COVID shot versus all other vaccines (past and present) in a separate post.

1. Excerpt from The Nursing Home Narrative: Can Andrew Cuomo’s “Nursing Home Policy” Be Blamed for the New York City Death Spike in the Spring of 2020?” (13 April 2026)

Transcript [emphases added]

Don Najita: Any thoughts on Bryan Ardis’ venom theory, with regard to-

Jessica Hockett: I don’t know it. I don’t know it.

Don: He’s of the opinion that there’s research indicating that the spike protein, as well as components in the injections, contain snake peptides or peptides derived from snake venom and that they’re, you know, and some of the symptomology and adverse effects mirror snake venom. 

Jessica: So, I think, let me say this, because I’m not an expert on the contents of the shot, but I have a view similar to Katherine Watt’s. She’s a U.S., she’s a paralegal and has done a lot. She’s from Pennsylvania. Her work’s on Bailiwick News, on WordPress. She left Substack too and put her, archived her work on WordPress. 

And she’s looked at all the U.S. biologics laws. And as a result of conversing with her and looking at her work, I think she’s right. (Sorry, Katherine, if I get this wrong.) But I don’t think we can ever know or have ever known what’s in any single vial of any vaccine of any kind. They’re, it’s completely unregulated. It’s not stable. There’s no evidence that what’s in this vial and what’s in this vial are the same, even if they’re purportedly for the same thing. Or, I know she doesn’t make a distinction between like flu shot, COVID shot, polio shot, whatever it is. We don’t, we don’t know. We can’t link this stuff to anything. All this – well, batches, this, that, she’s like, it’s all, we don’t know. Reject all of it. It’s all poison. It’s all, you don’t, you don’t need it. It’s all poison. 

So that’s, I’ve kind of taken that view too as a as a result of looking at the flu shot is what I was doing early on through data. Like, this thing changes every year? What? How do we know? We match strains based on the southern hemisphere? What? Right? 

So I think a lot of this, and PCR testing was [note: and is] used with flu too. A lot of things that were going on with COVID were going on with flu. People just didn’t know. They just didn’t know.

Don: I mean in some ways the mythology that we have about like lots and lot numbers and consistency and testing, in some ways we believe it because we’ve been told this for a long time. But how many people have actually done the diligence of going to see if these things are actually being carefully regulated and tracked? In the case of the COVID injectables, there is no record. 

Jessica: No. 

Don: The closest thing we have is some people testing leftover vials that people have donated or sourced together and, you know, maybe you can make claims about the thing that you tested, but you can’t really make claims about the entire lot or about the entire series of injectables because we could be looking at dozens of different formulations –

Jessica: Or the stability of what’s inside.

Don: …dozens of conditions of the product. Degraded, not degraded, stored properly, not stored properly. 

Jessica: Exactly. 

Don: Manufactured improperly with contaminants. I mean there’s so many possibilities.

Jessica: I mean, just say, my generation was taught to say no to drugs. So just say no. They say that that program was not effective. It was for me. I’ve never taken at least an illicit drug at any point in my life. So I think if you just say no, you don’t get tested. I think that’s the solution is you starve the beast. You don’t wait around for an NIH director or HHS director or CDC or FDA. You don’t wait for them. They’re not, they’re not doing anything, so just say no. Just say no.

Don: Do not comply, as they say.

Jessica: Do not comply. Exactly.

---

Excerpt from How Easy and Legal It Is for Governments to Fake or Construct Outbreak and Pandemic Events (presentation by Jessica Hockett & Katherine Watt) (18 May 2026)

Hockett #4 – Solution/Problem/Solution Cycle (Vaccine-Outbreak-Testing-Vaccine)

Number 4 for me is – and I, much like Katherine – I didn’t question vaccines, vaccination, the so-called childhood immunization schedule. I did what I was told with my own children. I wasn’t necessarily a vaccine advocate, I didn’t talk about vaccines, and I knew there were people who were anti-vax, we’ll talk about that a little bit later, and I didn’t have any problem with people who decided not to get vaccines or to get them for their own children. I was kind of libertarian on that point.

But over the past 6 years, I’ve seen that there seems to be this cycle, especially when it comes to vaccination for adults, although the same is probably true with kids as well, of solution-problem-solution, where we have vaccines, then there’s like an “outbreak”. Oh, wait, the vaccine didn’t work, or we had an outbreak because some people weren’t vaccinated. Oh, look. We’re not catching all the cases, now we have to test everybody in this, alleged measles outbreak, right? Or in this “flu outbreak”. Now we need a vaccine. Oh, look, we discovered a new strain. We need a strain for that vaccine. [Correction: Vaccine for that strain, but possible vice-versa too.]. If you didn’t see that, through the COVID era, the variants: Now we need something that works for this.

It’s just this vicious, ongoing cycle. But as you’ve demonstrated through your work, Katherine, vaccines are not now, and really have never been what they’re purported to be. Whether something called a vaccine is even possible, I think that question is very much up for debate.

My entry points for grasping a lot of these problems were different from yours but was from looking at the flu surveillance and the flu shot program and related studies. A lot of things that people were saying about the COVID shot I didn’t see, and still don’t see, how they’re any less true for the flu shot. This thing changes every year. They say that it’s targeted to a strain based on what was circulating in Australia. The whole thing just seems like hocus-pocus to me. And reading, what’s the one publication by Alfred Wallace? Do you know which one I’m talking about, Katherine, about smallpox? [1898 – Vaccination a delusion: its penal enforcement a crime, proved by the official evidence in the reports of the Royal Commission, Alfred Russel Wallace]

It was a kind of an OG [slang: “original gangster’] anti-vaxxer, highly-readable publication, where he’s pointing out these games going on with cause of death attribution, and doctors not wanting to say that the smallpox vaccine was not working, and probably killed a child, and so they attribute the death to something else. It’s fascinating. In a lot of ways, there’s nothing new under the sun. You realize we are not the first generation to see the problems with this racket.

Through studying different out- “outbreak reports” particularly, I would direct people to the Kirkland Nursing Home Outbreak Report. There’s one for DuPage County here that involves a local nursing home. You just, if you if you read these, even just from a qualitative perspective, you’re like, Okay, I think this is all contrived. What they have here is they have somebody with some symptoms. They give them a test, or a test for the new thing. Then they test everybody else, whether they’re sick or not, and then they call the thing an outbreak.

And I’ve come to wonder, especially with nursing homes, where, at least in Illinois, a lot of people are required to get, or [are] cajoled into getting the flu shot, you just wonder if these outbreaks are really a way of covering up shot failures and harms, and then justifying development and redevelopment of vaccines.

I don’t see why anybody should be tested, while they have so-called, respiratory illness, or – we experience these symptoms; they’re real symptoms – but I don’t see why a test is necessary at at all. You don’t need a test in order for the doctor to give you some advice or give you something to address a symptom. And I think you and I both, Katherine, have seen how these disease surveillance systems are really surveillance – they’re for control, but there’s a fine line, or there’s no real difference between surveilling disease and surveilling people. That’s really what it comes down to.

And this data is used to depict a fiction, right? Put these time series graphs together to make you think that you’re looking at the behavior of a pathogen, but that’s not the case at all.

---

Comment on The New York Times story “Kennedy Seeks to Expedite Appeal of Ruling That Blocked His Vaccine Policies” (15 June 2026)

Text:

The vaccine “schedule” should not exist. Period.

In truth, U.S. law has never required vaccines to be held to any kind of design standards, and there is no way to tell what is in each vile [sic], irrespective of the label applied, i.e., the disease or illness which the contents are alleged to prevent.

How about we blind-test the contents of all available vaccines? (Idea/procedure credit to paralegal & writer Katherine Watt)

A law-enforcement agency obtains vials or syringes from pharmacies and clinics, records the original labels, replaces them with neutral codes, and submits the coded samples to an independent team of qualified scientists (microbiologists, analytical chemists, biochemists, toxicologists, pharmacologists, pharmacists).

The team would be asked to identify and quantify every detectable biological, chemical, synthetic, and metallic component in each sample, and then determine – based on the contents alone – which disease or diseases each vaccine had been labeled as preventing.

Could it be done? I say no.

And that reality alone should be enough to make any sensible American consider if we’ve been sold a bill of goods on all products called vaccines.

---

COVID Shot

Flu

Vaccine Abolitionism