Category: Origins
-
Excerpts from email exchanges
-
Simon Wood and colleagues land an analysis in a respected journal and mention in mainstream media
-
Senator Rand Paul’s document release doesn’t indict Ralph Baric’s research and adds little to what is already known
-
Analysis of UKHSA-released emails between Maria Zambon and Marion Koopmans in January 2020 about 2019-nCoV
-
Good example of an artificial interaction
-
…because the virologists who designed the PCR protocol almost certainly won’t.
-
What was “needed” politically versus legally
-
Fact-checking a claim made by Christian Drosten on 23 January 2020 – and pondering whether “it” had to be a SARS-related virus
-
Replying to Toby Rogers. article How Big Pharma hijacked Evidence-Based Medicine, Part I, I said: I’m sincerely not understanding how you can see EBM [evidenced-based medicine] so clearly and yet hold to a “released bioweapon” view on SARS-CoV-2. Below is my reaction to relevant portions of a speech you made at Brownstone in 2023, which BI republished not…
-
Dialogue on Substack with Tim West and others
-
Critique of the COVID-19 lab origin hypothesis, as articulated by Matt Ridley and Prof Anton van der Merwe (University of Oxford)
-
Reaction to statements made by Debbie Lerman
-
Exploration and articulation of hypothesis involving SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 having different and/or lab-based origins. Initially published in May 2025.
-
Reaction to parts of “Improving the Safety and Security of Biological Research”
-
Is it just me, or we are caught in a game of COVID Origins ping-pong?
-
From the looks of the early months, no.
-
Reactions to points 1-5 and other irrelevant or distracting material on COVID.gov
-
A non-scientist’s perspective
-
Conversation between me and my daughter
-
Still asking: Was SARS-CoV-2 a spreading viral threat?
-
Surveying the Lab Origin/Lab Leak landscape
-
The truth won’t stay hidden forever
-
A Los Angeles County nursing home serology study raises fundamental questions about SARS-CoV-2 (includes comparison with New York City)
-
Being trapped inside a false binary for five years can’t be easy…
-
Lab Origin proponents want everyone to accept observations on faith, yet fail to deliver a robust hypothesis
-
The Corman-Drosten protocol’s reliance on unidentified social media reports for detecting a SARS-like virus raises concerns about scientific rigor — and questions about which reports were “relied on”.
-
Great example of a false binary that has dominated and directed The Narrative for five years…
-
Clarifying the context and distinguishing Ratcliffe’s opinion from the agency’s assessment under President Biden
-
Observations and commentary
-
Responding to “On Gain of Function research and why exiting the WHO and ending this research is critical
-
I am not republishing this article on WH76 WordPress. Archive Today versions provided below. https://archive.ph/UeWhM#selection-463.0-463.64
-
Not letting the fish off the hook
-
Reactions to Robert Malone, David Martin, and others (from Twitter threads in December 2023)
-
Lab-leak/wet-market scenarios are ‘equally implausible’ and claims about threats posed by GoF research ‘overblown’ (including by a ‘very nervous’ Tony Fauci)
-
It came from the WHO
-
Was SARS-CoV-2 a threat? Are we sure?
-
Two outlets with reputations for publishing COVID-dissenting articles have rejected our proposal for challenging dominant Virus Origin stories
-
Documenting my current thoughts
-
Archived from X
-
Politicized disputes over what to name 2019-nCoV raise critical questions about what, and how novel, the virus really was – and whether something was suddenly spreading at all
-
Observations & questions arising from a common-sense reading of a 2 March 2018 research letter often invoked by Lab Leak enthusiasts
-
Perspective on what Donald President Trump meant during the March 20, 2020 Coronavirus Task Force press conference
-
The “first” person to person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the U.S. was no such thing.