I agree with Jonathan Engler that Peter McCullough is a “Next Pandemicist.”
https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/mccullough-is-a-next-pandemicist
I’ll take it further: Peter McCullough is one of many 2020+ Pandemicists who were witting or unwitting players in a multi-sided sided U.S. government operation.
A reason I say this is because McCullough fits a rule of thumb adapted from Jonathan Couey of Gigaohm Biological:
If you were hearing from or about the person in spring 2020 – even in a “bad light” – the government wanted you to hear from that person.
Peter McCullough is/was, in my humble opinion, like Pierre Kory, part of a staged “COVID treatment” debate from get-go, whether he knew it or not.
For example, McCullough was quoted in an April 24, 2020 Wall Street Journal article which also mentions Anthony Fauci.
IT DOES NOT MATTER if McCullough and Fauci weren’t saying the same thing about CQ/HCQ per se. They were both supporting the Core Story about a sudden-spreading risk-additive coronavirus from Somewhere.
McCullough showed up again in WSJ a few days later in another article aimed at the investor crowd.
Again, IT DOES NOT MATTER that McCullough was on the Early Treatment side of the “Early Treatment vs. Vents/New Shot” battle. What matters is that he was a) elevated, not censored and b) doing nothing to challenge the government’s claim about a New Spreading Thing in need of Repurposed Drugs.
It therefore comes as no surprise that Peter McCullough is pushing pandemics in 2024.
This is not the first time I have shared my perspective on Dr. McCullough. Example posts:
UPDATE: 21 Feb 2025 – As expected, McCullough and others are still pushing ‘Next Pandemic’ and the Official Story about 2020 remains intact and relatively unchallenged by the most prominent Covid dissidents: https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/our-worst-fears-are-coming-true
See also James Todaro as an example of the very early “Early Treatment” push that ultimately protected the Official Narrative.
Leave a Reply